clear one pixel transparent
Twitter       Facebook       RSS       Contact Us


University Officials respond to New York Times Article

   Following is the University's response to the April 16, 2014 New York Times article.  

The university expresses its deep disappointment in today's New York Times story alleging FSU officials did not properly investigate a rape allegation against Jameis Winston "in apparent violation of federal law." It also vigorously objects to the newspaper's characterization of the university as
being uncooperative in explaining its actions.

The university provided the newspaper with a general statement (below) and numerous written answers over a period of weeks. Most of the responses were left out of the story, giving readers an incorrect impression of the university's efforts on behalf of sexual assault victims under Title IX.

Among the points FSU emphasized but were either missing or downplayed in the NYT article: 

FSU does not tolerate sexual assault. Even one sexual assault is a problem. Like other colleges and universities that are grappling with this issue, we actively provide programs and educate students on safe behavior, the meaning of consent and how to properly report cases of sexual
misconduct. Contrary to the article's over-arching theme, FSU takes this matter seriously.

State and federal privacy laws govern the university's ability to comment on a particular student or disciplinary matter. This is particularly crucial in cases of sexual assault, where victims may request privacy to heal. To interpret the university's silence as a lack of interest or an insufficient "level of energy" is utterly wrong.

The university must balance its duty to investigate sexual assault cases with the welfare of the victim. Many students who contact the Victim Advocate Program make it clear they are only seeking counseling and academic accommodations. They either decline or want to delay the decision to go forward with university or criminal proceedings. Guidance from the U.S. Dept. of Education (April 2011 "Dear Colleague" letter) makes it abundantly clear that the university needs to take these wishes into account.  To rush victims or disregard their wishes not to proceed would be re-traumatizing and hinder their recovery.

Nevertheless, as part of its services to victims, the Victim Advocate Program always advises its clients about the option to file a criminal or Code of Conduct complaint or both. Advocates often explain the option more than once and even offer to support the victim through every step of the process, including accompanying the victim to the police station or a student Code of Conduct hearing.

The article also failed to explain the extent of the other services offered by the university's victim advocates, who are trained and dedicated professionals providing 24-hour, on-call assistance to victims. Among the services are finding a victim or family members a safe place to stay; making referrals to counselors; re-arranging class schedules to accommodate the victim's needs; contacting professors to reschedule exams; finding accommodations for the victim's roommates; planning social accommodations; helping victims drop classes or get copies of their transcripts; and providing support and resources to family members. These accommodations are precisely the
type of actions contemplated by the "Dear Colleague" letter and are offered to every victim.

The Victim Advocate Program operates under a statute unique to Florida that gives all rape crisis counselors a confidentiality privilege.  Advocates cannot breach this confidentiality--even to talk to police--without a waiver from the client.  

In the case examined by The Times involving Jameis Winston, no university official outside the Victim Advocate Program received a report from any complainant naming Winston prior to when the allegations were made public in November 2013.

At no time has there been or is there now a complaint on record from a student referred to by the State Attorney's Office. The university has been aware of the information in The Times article,
however, and has fulfilled all of its legal obligations under Title IX.  

The paper's suggestion that FSU underreports sexual assaults is misleading. The campus statistics used by The Times to make that point do not account for the crucial fact that 83 percent of FSU's
students live off-campus, where incidents are handled by the Tallahassee Police Department and are not required to be reported as part of the university's annual campus crime statistics. Despite this, the university provides full victim services to any student regardless of where he or she lives.

The Times has done its readers, as well as the FSU community, a disservice by omitting these
answers and by seriously misrepresenting the university's concern and care for its students who are victims of sexual assault.



PRIOR TO 4.16.2014

    Following is the full statement the university gave The New York Times prior to today's article:

Like all other colleges and universities, FSU is faced with a balancing act when following the "Dear Colleague" letter. The need to investigate possible harassment must be balanced against the rights of and consent from the complainant. As the letter states: "If the complainant requests confidentiality or asks that the complaint not be pursued, the school should take all reasonable steps to investigate and respond to the complaint consistent with the request for confidentiality or request not to pursue an investigation."

Given the inherent tension within the "Dear Colleague" letter, FSU seeks to empower victims by giving great weight to their wishes when it comes to counseling, academic accommodations and supporting them through criminal or university proceedings. In a great number of cases, the victims make it quite clear that they don't want to file a police report or pursue a Code of Conduct process.

FSU's Title IX/Code of Conduct process has worked well for the vast majority of sexual assault cases. The process has provided victims with the emotional and procedural help they need, and the university has handled dozens of cases over the years that have resulted in the discipline of respondents.

 - - - - - - - - - - -  


Welcome to Advocate for Florida State

For the Office of Governmental Relations, the start of interim legislative committee meetings in late September signaled the start of the 2014 legislative session. These committee meetings will continue to be held intermittently until February, and the 60-day legislative session will be gaveled to order on Tuesday, March 4th.

When contacting your state House and Senate members, please be sure to mention one or more of Florida State University's Talking Points, which are provided for your reference.


State economists calculate a revenue surplus of about $800 million for the coming fiscal year.  It is estimated that half of this amount is non-recurring. The Governor stated recently he will ask lawmakers to cut $500 million in taxes and fees and indicated he will request lawmakers trim the 2014-2015 state budget by $100 million.

As for Florida State's legislative priorities, central will be the university’s vigilant pursuit of its second installment of the $15 million in preeminence money that was allocated last year.

Florida State has also prioritized the distribution of capital-outlay allocations, particularly those for the Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences building (EAOS), and building maintenance dollars.

The Governmental Relations office will lead the university's legislative-advocacy efforts through the following:

  1. Continuing the statewide legislative-activism initiative that identifies, in collaboration with the Alumni Association, prominent alumni throughout the state who are willing to present the university’s priorities to their local legislators, both one-on-one and during public meetings of their local legislative delegations. This initiative was first instituted prior to the 2013 session and was well received by state legislators and our alumni base.
  2. Working with the Seminole Legislative Caucus, which currently includes 39 alumni and friends who are members of the legislature, continue to be extremely supportive of the university’s advocacy efforts.
  3. During recent interim committee meetings, President Barron testified before the House Higher Education Subcommittee with an update on the university’s preeminence initiatives. In the course of that testimony, Dr. Barron also took the opportunity to present a white paper he authored on greater job creation and career success for our students. President Barron continues to advance this proposal by meeting with key legislators and the Governor.
  4. Last year, the Governmental Relations office placed 64 FSU student interns in state legislators’ offices. We aim to increase that amount for the 2014 session. 
  5. The Governmental Relations office will continue to heighten awareness among the university's constituencies through ongoing updates of this website.

Finally, FSU Day at the Capitol is scheduled to take place next year on April 1st.   A reception for legislators, sponsored by the Student Government Association, will be held the night before on March 31st, on the 22nd floor of the Capitol building. We hope each of you will be able to join us for these special events.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

This site is provided at no cost to Florida taxpayers, the State of Florida or Florida State University.

seminolecaucus2.jpgFlorida legislature Governor's officeFederal relations